Automation Studio vs CODESYS

Comprehensive comparison of two leading PLC programming platforms

B&R Industrial Automation (ABB Group)CODESYS GmbH (3S-Smart Software Solutions)Updated 2025

Automation Studio

B&R Industrial Automation (ABB Group)

70
Overall Score
Price:$$
Learning:intermediate
Adoption:45%

Excellent for high-speed packaging machinery

CODESYS

CODESYS GmbH (3S-Smart Software Solutions)

85
Overall Score
Price:$
Learning:beginner-intermediate
Adoption:70%

FREE basic version - perfect for learning

Overall Winner

CODESYS leads with an overall score of 85/100

CODESYS is the stronger overall choice with better pricing. However, Automation Studio may be preferable if you prioritize community support or if you're already committed to the B&R Industrial Automation (ABB Group) ecosystem.

Score Breakdown

CategoryAutomation StudioCODESYS
Overall
70
85
Pricing
75
100
Ease of Use
50
70
Features
84
86
Industry Adoption
55
83
Community Support
91
100
Career Value
68
77

Real-World Scenario Recommendations

See how Automation Studio and CODESYS perform in specific industry scenarios to help guide your decision.

Small Machine Builder

OEM building compact machines with 50-200 I/O points, typically for niche markets or specialized applications

Budget: 5000-25000Team: 1-3 programmersDuration: 2-6 months per machine

Automation Studio

Excellent choice for small OEMs focused on packaging, food processing, or pharmaceutical machinery. B&R (now ABB) Automation Studio licensing ($1,000-$8,000) is reasonable, and the Mapp Technology framework dramatically accelerates development. These pre-built function blocks handle common packaging tasks (conveyor control, recipe management, batch processing) that would take weeks to program from...

CODESYS

Perhaps the best strategic choice for small OEMs with growth ambitions. CODESYS basic version is FREE, and professional features are affordable ($0-$2,000). The killer advantage: hardware flexibility. Your first machines might use WAGO controllers (cost-effective), but as you grow, you can switch to other brands using the SAME programming environment. This prevents vendor lock-in and gives you neg...

Key Considerations:
  • Per-machine software licensing cost vs expected production volume
  • Time-to-market pressure - can you afford 6+ month learning curves?
  • Target customer geography and brand preferences
  • Hardware cost optimization - some platforms offer cheaper controllers

Automotive Tier 1 Supplier

Tier 1 automotive supplier providing systems and components directly to OEM vehicle manufacturers (VW, BMW, GM, Ford, Toyota, etc.)

Budget: 50000-500000+ per lineTeam: 5-50 automation engineersDuration: 12-36 months per production line

Automation Studio

Strategic choice for Tier 1 suppliers specializing in specific automotive sectors where B&R excels: automotive paint shops (B&R has strong track record in paint atomizer control), electric vehicle battery assembly (precision handling and traceability), and automotive glass manufacturing. ABB's ownership of B&R (since 2017) has strengthened automotive credentials. The Automation Studio licensing ($...

CODESYS

Limited direct application for automotive Tier 1 suppliers due to OEM brand preferences, but valuable strategic knowledge. CODESYS underlies many automation platforms (including Schneider's EcoStruxure), so understanding it helps with multiple systems. Some automotive OEMs in China and emerging markets are more open to CODESYS-based controllers, offering cost advantages. The free engineering softw...

Key Considerations:
  • Customer-specified platforms are non-negotiable - verify before any engineering investment
  • Long-term parts availability (15-20 years) is critical for automotive
  • Safety certifications (SIL 2/SIL 3) must be well-established and accepted
  • Customer's plant maintenance teams must be trained on your platform

Process Industry (Chemical, Oil & Gas, Pharma)

Continuous process control in chemical plants, refineries, pharmaceutical manufacturing, and other process industries requiring high reliability and regulatory compliance

Budget: 100000-2000000+ per projectTeam: 10-100+ engineersDuration: 24-60 months

Automation Studio

Limited process industry adoption despite B&R's capabilities. The Automation Studio platform is primarily oriented toward discrete manufacturing and packaging. While technically capable of process control, the ecosystem lacks deep integration with process instrumentation and safety systems common in chemical, oil and gas, or pharmaceutical applications. The market positioning doesn't emphasize pro...

CODESYS

Underlying platform for several process automation systems (including Schneider's EcoStruxure), but rarely deployed directly in process industries. The hardware flexibility could theoretically reduce vendor lock-in, but process plants prioritize long-term single-vendor support over flexibility. The free engineering software is attractive for development, but process plants need vendor guarantees f...

Key Considerations:
  • Redundancy and high availability are mandatory for critical processes
  • Safety certifications (SIL 2/SIL 3) for emergency shutdown systems
  • Long-term vendor support (20-30 year plant lifecycles)
  • Integration with process instrumentation and field devices

💰Pricing Comparison

CODESYS ($) is significantly more affordable than Automation Studio ($$). CODESYS costs between $0 and $2 000, while Automation Studio ranges from $1 000 to $8 000.

📚Learning Curve

CODESYS (rated 5/10) is easier to learn than Automation Studio (rated 6/10). CODESYS typically takes 2-4 months to learn, while Automation Studio requires 4-6 months. This makes CODESYS better for beginners.

⚙️Features & Capabilities

Automation Studio offers 11 key features including safety programming, motion control, robotics integration. CODESYS provides 11 key features with safety programming, motion control, robotics integration. Both platforms offer a comprehensive feature set for industrial automation.

🏭Industry Adoption

CODESYS has 70% market adoption compared to Automation Studio's 45%. CODESYS dominates in Europe, Asia-Pacific, North America, while Automation Studio is strongest in Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific. CODESYS's higher adoption means more job opportunities and community resources.

🔌Hardware Compatibility

Automation Studio is designed specifically for B&R Automation (ABB) hardware, while CODESYS works with Over 500 manufacturers including Schneider Electric, Wago, Eaton, ifm, Festo, Bosch Rexroth PLCs. Both are vendor-specific solutions optimized for their respective hardware ecosystems.

💼Career Prospects

Both Automation Studio and CODESYS offer similar career value with certification programs. Knowledge of either platform will open automation career opportunities.

Automation Studio Overview

Key Strengths

  • Excellent for high-speed packaging machinery
  • Strong motion control capabilities
  • Modern development environment
  • C/C++ programming option for complex logic

Limitations

  • Less common than Siemens/Rockwell (fewer jobs)
  • Smaller user community
  • Limited third-party resources

Best For

High-speed packaging machineryFood and beverage processingPharmaceutical manufacturing

CODESYS Overview

Key Strengths

  • FREE basic version - perfect for learning
  • Supports wide range of hardware (500+ manufacturers)
  • Pure IEC 61131-3 standard compliance
  • Excellent for education and training

Limitations

  • Less recognized brand than Siemens/Rockwell
  • Professional features require paid add-ons
  • Fewer job postings specifically for CODESYS

Best For

Learning PLC programming and IEC 61131-3Students and hobbyists (free version)OEM machine builders

Recommendations

For Beginners

CODESYS

For Professionals

Both are suitable

Budget-Constrained

CODESYS

Enterprise Use

CODESYS

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: Automation Studio or CODESYS?

CODESYS is the stronger overall choice with better pricing. However, Automation Studio may be preferable if you prioritize community support or if you're already committed to the B&R Industrial Automation (ABB Group) ecosystem.

What is the price difference between Automation Studio and CODESYS?

CODESYS ($) is significantly more affordable than Automation Studio ($$). CODESYS costs between $0 and $2 000, while Automation Studio ranges from $1 000 to $8 000.

Which is easier to learn: Automation Studio or CODESYS?

CODESYS (rated 5/10) is easier to learn than Automation Studio (rated 6/10). CODESYS typically takes 2-4 months to learn, while Automation Studio requires 4-6 months. This makes CODESYS better for beginners.

Which has better career prospects?

Both Automation Studio and CODESYS offer similar career value with certification programs. Knowledge of either platform will open automation career opportunities.

Related Comparisons