GX Works3 vs PLCnext
Comprehensive comparison of two leading PLC programming platforms
GX Works3
Mitsubishi Electric
User-friendly interface, easier learning curve
PLCnext
Phoenix Contact
FREE programming software
Overall Winner
GX Works3 leads with an overall score of 81/100
GX Works3 is the stronger overall choice with better community support. However, PLCnext may be preferable if you prioritize pricing or if you're already committed to the Phoenix Contact ecosystem.
Score Breakdown
| Category | GX Works3 | PLCnext |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 81✓ | 64 |
| Pricing | 75 | 100✓ |
| Ease of Use | 80✓ | 40 |
| Features | 86✓ | 69 |
| Industry Adoption | 80✓ | 38 |
| Community Support | 91 | 94✓ |
| Career Value | 74✓ | 58 |
💰Pricing Comparison
PLCnext ($) is significantly more affordable than GX Works3 ($$). PLCnext costs between $0 and $2,000, while GX Works3 ranges from $1,000 to $5,000.
📚Learning Curve
GX Works3 (rated 4/10) is easier to learn than PLCnext (rated 7/10). GX Works3 typically takes 1-3 months to learn, while PLCnext requires 4-8 months. This makes GX Works3 better for beginners.
⚙️Features & Capabilities
GX Works3 offers 11 key features including safety programming, motion control, robotics integration. PLCnext provides 11 key features with motion control. Both platforms offer a comprehensive feature set for industrial automation.
🏭Industry Adoption
GX Works3 has 65% market adoption compared to PLCnext's 25%. GX Works3 dominates in Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, while PLCnext is strongest in Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific. GX Works3's higher adoption means more job opportunities and community resources.
🔌Hardware Compatibility
GX Works3 is designed specifically for Mitsubishi Electric hardware, while PLCnext works with Phoenix Contact PLCs. Both are vendor-specific solutions optimized for their respective hardware ecosystems.
💼Career Prospects
GX Works3 offers stronger career prospects with 65% market adoption and official certification programs. PLCnext has 25% adoption and is also backed by certifications. For maximum employability, GX Works3 expertise is more in-demand.
GX Works3 Overview
Key Strengths
- ✓User-friendly interface, easier learning curve
- ✓More affordable than competitors
- ✓Strong in Asia-Pacific market
- ✓Good simulation capabilities
Limitations
- ✗Less common in North America
- ✗Smaller community compared to Siemens/Rockwell
- ✗Limited third-party integration
Best For
PLCnext Overview
Key Strengths
- ✓FREE programming software
- ✓Open, modern architecture
- ✓Multiple programming language support
- ✓IoT and Industry 4.0 ready
Limitations
- ✗Relatively new platform (limited adoption)
- ✗Small user community
- ✗Fewer job postings
Best For
Recommendations
For Beginners
GX Works3
For Professionals
GX Works3
Budget-Constrained
PLCnext
Enterprise Use
GX Works3
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: GX Works3 or PLCnext?
GX Works3 is the stronger overall choice with better community support. However, PLCnext may be preferable if you prioritize pricing or if you're already committed to the Phoenix Contact ecosystem.
What is the price difference between GX Works3 and PLCnext?
PLCnext ($) is significantly more affordable than GX Works3 ($$). PLCnext costs between $0 and $2,000, while GX Works3 ranges from $1,000 to $5,000.
Which is easier to learn: GX Works3 or PLCnext?
GX Works3 (rated 4/10) is easier to learn than PLCnext (rated 7/10). GX Works3 typically takes 1-3 months to learn, while PLCnext requires 4-8 months. This makes GX Works3 better for beginners.
Which has better career prospects?
GX Works3 offers stronger career prospects with 65% market adoption and official certification programs. PLCnext has 25% adoption and is also backed by certifications. For maximum employability, GX Works3 expertise is more in-demand.