Mitsubishi GX Works2/GX Works3 for Safety Systems
GX Works3 represents Mitsubishi's latest engineering software supporting the MELSEC iQ-R and iQ-F series controllers, while GX Works2 remains in use for legacy Q, L, and FX5 series PLCs. The programming environment features a project-based structure organizing programs into multiple POUs (Program Organization Units) including main programs, function blocks, and structured projects. Unlike Western PLC manufacturers, Mitsubishi supports both device-addressed programming (X0, Y0, M0, D0) and label-...
Platform Strengths for Safety Systems:
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Fast processing speeds
- Compact form factors
- Strong support in Asia-Pacific
Unique ${brand.software} Features:
- Simple Motion module integration with motion SFC (Sequential Function Chart) programming eliminating complex positioning code
- RD.DPR instruction providing direct device programming without software transfer for recipe adjustments
- Melsoft Navigator project management integrating multiple controllers, HMIs, and network devices in unified environment
- Multiple CPU configuration allowing up to 4 CPUs in single rack sharing memory via high-speed backplane
Key Capabilities:
The GX Works2/GX Works3 environment excels at Safety Systems applications through its excellent price-to-performance ratio. This is particularly valuable when working with the 5 sensor types typically found in Safety Systems systems, including Safety light curtains, Emergency stop buttons, Safety door switches.
Control Equipment for Safety Systems:
- Safety PLCs (fail-safe controllers)
- Safety relays (configurable or fixed)
- Safety I/O modules with diagnostics
- Safety network protocols (PROFIsafe, CIP Safety)
Mitsubishi's controller families for Safety Systems include:
- FX5: Suitable for advanced Safety Systems applications
- iQ-R: Suitable for advanced Safety Systems applications
- iQ-F: Suitable for advanced Safety Systems applications
- Q Series: Suitable for advanced Safety Systems applications
Hardware Selection Guidance:
Mitsubishi offers several controller families addressing different performance and application requirements. The MELSEC iQ-R series represents the flagship product line with processing speeds as fast as 0.98ns per basic instruction supporting applications from small machines to complex automated systems. R04CPU provides 40K steps program capacity and 256K words data memory suitable for compact mac...
Industry Recognition:
High - Popular in electronics manufacturing, packaging, and assembly. Mitsubishi PLCs serve Japanese and Asian automotive manufacturers with MELSEC iQ-R controllers managing assembly line transfers, welding automation, and quality inspection systems. Body assembly lines use multiple CPU configurations (up to 4 CPUs in single rack) distributing control: CPU1 handles co...
Investment Considerations:
With $$ pricing, Mitsubishi positions itself in the mid-range segment. For Safety Systems projects requiring advanced skill levels and 4-8 weeks development time, the total investment includes hardware, software licensing, training, and ongoing support.
Understanding Ladder Logic for Safety Systems
Ladder Logic (LAD) is a graphical programming language that represents control circuits as rungs on a ladder. It was designed to mimic the appearance of relay logic diagrams, making it intuitive for electricians and maintenance technicians familiar with hardwired control systems.
Execution Model:
Programs execute from left to right, top to bottom. Each rung is evaluated during the PLC scan cycle, with input conditions on the left determining whether output coils on the right are energized.
Core Advantages for Safety Systems:
- Highly visual and intuitive: Critical for Safety Systems when handling advanced control logic
- Easy to troubleshoot: Critical for Safety Systems when handling advanced control logic
- Industry standard: Critical for Safety Systems when handling advanced control logic
- Minimal programming background required: Critical for Safety Systems when handling advanced control logic
- Easy to read and understand: Critical for Safety Systems when handling advanced control logic
Why Ladder Logic Fits Safety Systems:
Safety Systems systems in Universal typically involve:
- Sensors: Emergency stop buttons (Category 0 or 1 stop), Safety light curtains (Type 2 or Type 4), Safety laser scanners for zone detection
- Actuators: Safety contactors (mirror contact type), Safe torque off (STO) drives, Safety brake modules
- Complexity: Advanced with challenges including Achieving required safety level with practical architecture
Programming Fundamentals in Ladder Logic:
Contacts:
- xic: Examine If Closed (XIC) - Normally Open contact that passes power when the associated bit is TRUE/1
- xio: Examine If Open (XIO) - Normally Closed contact that passes power when the associated bit is FALSE/0
- risingEdge: One-Shot Rising (OSR) - Passes power for one scan when input transitions from FALSE to TRUE
Coils:
- ote: Output Energize (OTE) - Standard output coil, energized when rung conditions are true
- otl: Output Latch (OTL) - Latching coil that remains ON until explicitly unlatched
- otu: Output Unlatch (OTU) - Unlatch coil that turns off a latched output
Branches:
- parallel: OR logic - Multiple paths allow current flow if ANY path is complete
- series: AND logic - All contacts in series must be closed for current flow
- nested: Complex logic combining parallel and series branches
Best Practices for Ladder Logic:
- Keep rungs simple - split complex logic into multiple rungs for clarity
- Use descriptive tag names that indicate function (e.g., Motor_Forward_CMD not M001)
- Place most restrictive conditions first (leftmost) for faster evaluation
- Group related rungs together with comment headers
- Use XIO contacts for safety interlocks at the start of output rungs
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Using the same OTE coil in multiple rungs (causes unpredictable behavior)
- Forgetting to include stop conditions in seal-in circuits
- Not using one-shots for counter inputs, causing multiple counts per event
- Placing outputs before all conditions are evaluated
Typical Applications:
1. Start/stop motor control: Directly applicable to Safety Systems
2. Conveyor systems: Related control patterns
3. Assembly lines: Related control patterns
4. Traffic lights: Related control patterns
Understanding these fundamentals prepares you to implement effective Ladder Logic solutions for Safety Systems using Mitsubishi GX Works2/GX Works3.
Implementing Safety Systems with Ladder Logic
Safety system control uses safety-rated PLCs and components to protect personnel and equipment from hazardous conditions. These systems implement safety functions per IEC 62443 and ISO 13849 standards with redundancy and diagnostics.
This walkthrough demonstrates practical implementation using Mitsubishi GX Works2/GX Works3 and Ladder Logic programming.
System Requirements:
A typical Safety Systems implementation includes:
Input Devices (Sensors):
1. Emergency stop buttons (Category 0 or 1 stop): Critical for monitoring system state
2. Safety light curtains (Type 2 or Type 4): Critical for monitoring system state
3. Safety laser scanners for zone detection: Critical for monitoring system state
4. Safety interlock switches (tongue, hinged, trapped key): Critical for monitoring system state
5. Safety mats and edges: Critical for monitoring system state
Output Devices (Actuators):
1. Safety contactors (mirror contact type): Primary control output
2. Safe torque off (STO) drives: Supporting control function
3. Safety brake modules: Supporting control function
4. Lock-out valve manifolds: Supporting control function
5. Safety relay outputs: Supporting control function
Control Equipment:
- Safety PLCs (fail-safe controllers)
- Safety relays (configurable or fixed)
- Safety I/O modules with diagnostics
- Safety network protocols (PROFIsafe, CIP Safety)
Control Strategies for Safety Systems:
1. Primary Control: Safety-rated PLC programming for personnel protection, emergency stops, and safety interlocks per IEC 61508/61511.
2. Safety Interlocks: Preventing Safety integrity level (SIL) compliance
3. Error Recovery: Handling Redundancy requirements
Implementation Steps:
Step 1: Perform hazard analysis and risk assessment
In GX Works2/GX Works3, perform hazard analysis and risk assessment.
Step 2: Determine required safety level (SIL/PL) for each function
In GX Works2/GX Works3, determine required safety level (sil/pl) for each function.
Step 3: Select certified safety components meeting requirements
In GX Works2/GX Works3, select certified safety components meeting requirements.
Step 4: Design safety circuit architecture per category requirements
In GX Works2/GX Works3, design safety circuit architecture per category requirements.
Step 5: Implement safety logic in certified safety PLC/relay
In GX Works2/GX Works3, implement safety logic in certified safety plc/relay.
Step 6: Add diagnostics and proof test provisions
In GX Works2/GX Works3, add diagnostics and proof test provisions.
Mitsubishi Function Design:
Function block (FB) programming in Mitsubishi creates reusable logic modules with defined interfaces encapsulating complexity. FB definition includes input variables (VAR_INPUT), output variables (VAR_OUTPUT), internal variables (VAR), and retained variables (VAR_RETAIN) maintaining values between calls. Creating motor control FB: inputs include Start_Cmd (BOOL), Stop_Cmd (BOOL), Speed_SP (INT), outputs include Running_Sts (BOOL), Fault_Sts (BOOL), Actual_Speed (INT), internal variables store timers, state machine stages, and diagnostic counters. FB instantiation creates instance: Motor1 (Motor_FB) with unique variable storage, allowing multiple instances Motor1, Motor2, Motor3 controlling different motors using same logic. Array of FB instances: Motors : ARRAY[1..10] OF Motor_FB accessed as Motors[3].Running_Sts checking status of motor 3. Standard function (FUN) differs from FB by lacking internal memory, suitable for calculations or conversions: Temp_Conversion_FUN(Celsius) returns Fahrenheit without retaining historical data. Structured text programming within FBs/FUNs provides clearer logic for complex algorithms compared to ladder: IF-THEN-ELSIF-ELSE structures, FOR loops, CASE statements expressing intent more directly than ladder equivalents. EN/ENO functionality enables conditional execution: EN (enable input) controls whether FB executes, ENO (enable output) indicates successful execution detecting errors within block. Library management exports FBs to library files (.glib) shared across projects and engineering teams, versioned to track modifications and ensure consistency. The intelligent function module (IFM) templates provide pre-built FBs for common applications: PID control, analog scaling, motion positioning reducing development time and providing tested reliable code. Simulation mode tests FB logic without hardware, allowing desktop development and unit testing before commissioning. Protection functionality encrypts FB contents preventing unauthorized viewing or modification, useful for proprietary algorithms or OEM machine builders distributing programs to end users.
Common Challenges and Solutions:
1. Achieving required safety level with practical architecture
- Solution: Ladder Logic addresses this through Highly visual and intuitive.
2. Managing nuisance trips while maintaining safety
- Solution: Ladder Logic addresses this through Easy to troubleshoot.
3. Integrating safety with production efficiency
- Solution: Ladder Logic addresses this through Industry standard.
4. Documenting compliance with multiple standards
- Solution: Ladder Logic addresses this through Minimal programming background required.
Safety Considerations:
- Use only certified safety components and PLCs
- Implement dual-channel monitoring per category requirements
- Add diagnostic coverage to detect latent faults
- Design for fail-safe operation (de-energize to trip)
- Provide regular proof testing of safety functions
Performance Metrics:
- Scan Time: Optimize for 5 inputs and 4 outputs
- Memory Usage: Efficient data structures for FX5 capabilities
- Response Time: Meeting Universal requirements for Safety Systems
Mitsubishi Diagnostic Tools:
Device memory monitor: Real-time table displaying current values for X, Y, M, D devices with force capability,Entry data monitor: Shows actual rung logic states with contact ON/OFF indication during program execution,Device test: Manually control outputs and set internal relays for wiring verification without program influence,Intelligent module diagnostics: Buffer memory display showing module status, error codes, and configuration,Scan time monitor: Displays current, maximum, and minimum scan times identifying performance issues,Error code history: Chronological log of system errors, module faults, and CPU events with timestamps,CC-Link/network diagnostics: Visual network status showing connected stations, errors, and communication statistics,SD card operation log: Records all SD card read/write operations, file transfers, and access timestamps,Remote diagnosis via Ethernet: Connect GX Works over network for monitoring and troubleshooting without local access,Sampling trace: Records device value changes over time with trigger conditions for intermittent fault analysis,System monitor: Displays CPU load, memory usage, and battery status for predictive maintenance,Safety diagnosis (safety CPU): Dedicated diagnostics for safety I/O discrepancy detection and emergency stop chain status
Mitsubishi's GX Works2/GX Works3 provides tools for performance monitoring and optimization, essential for achieving the 4-8 weeks development timeline while maintaining code quality.
Mitsubishi Ladder Logic Example for Safety Systems
Complete working example demonstrating Ladder Logic implementation for Safety Systems using Mitsubishi GX Works2/GX Works3. Follows Mitsubishi naming conventions. Tested on FX5 hardware.
// Mitsubishi GX Works2/GX Works3 - Safety Systems Control
// Ladder Logic Implementation
// Naming: Mitsubishi programming supports both traditional device addr...
NETWORK 1: Input Conditioning - Emergency stop buttons (Category 0 or 1 stop)
|----[ Safety_light_cu ]----[TON Timer_Debounce]----( Enable )
|
| Timer: On-Delay, PT: 500ms (debounce for Universal environment)
NETWORK 2: Safety Interlock Chain - Emergency stop priority
|----[ Enable ]----[ NOT E_Stop ]----[ Guards_OK ]----+----( Safe_To_Run )
| |
|----[ Fault_Active ]------------------------------------------+----( Alarm_Horn )
NETWORK 3: Main Safety Systems Control
|----[ Safe_To_Run ]----[ Emergency_st ]----+----( Safety_relay )
| |
|----[ Manual_Override ]----------------------------+
NETWORK 4: Sequence Control - State machine
|----[ Motor_Run ]----[CTU Cycle_Counter]----( Batch_Complete )
|
| Counter: PV := 50 (Universal batch size)
NETWORK 5: Output Control with Feedback
|----[ Safety_relay ]----[TON Feedback_Timer]----[ NOT Motor_Feedback ]----( Output_Fault )Code Explanation:
- 1.Network 1: Input conditioning with Mitsubishi-specific TON timer for debouncing in Universal environments
- 2.Network 2: Safety interlock chain ensuring Use only certified safety components and PLCs compliance
- 3.Network 3: Main Safety Systems control with manual override capability for maintenance
- 4.Network 4: Production counting using Mitsubishi CTU counter for batch tracking
- 5.Network 5: Output verification monitors actuator feedback - critical for advanced applications
- 6.Online monitoring: Online connection in GX Works provides multiple monitoring modes observing PLC o
Best Practices
- ✓Follow Mitsubishi naming conventions: Mitsubishi programming supports both traditional device addressing (M0, D100, X1
- ✓Mitsubishi function design: Function block (FB) programming in Mitsubishi creates reusable logic modules wit
- ✓Data organization: Mitsubishi uses file registers (R devices) and structured data in function block
- ✓Ladder Logic: Keep rungs simple - split complex logic into multiple rungs for clarity
- ✓Ladder Logic: Use descriptive tag names that indicate function (e.g., Motor_Forward_CMD not M001)
- ✓Ladder Logic: Place most restrictive conditions first (leftmost) for faster evaluation
- ✓Safety Systems: Keep safety logic simple and auditable
- ✓Safety Systems: Use certified function blocks from safety PLC vendor
- ✓Safety Systems: Implement cross-monitoring between channels
- ✓Debug with GX Works2/GX Works3: Use sampling trace to capture high-speed events occurring faster than
- ✓Safety: Use only certified safety components and PLCs
- ✓Use GX Works2/GX Works3 simulation tools to test Safety Systems logic before deployment
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- ⚠Ladder Logic: Using the same OTE coil in multiple rungs (causes unpredictable behavior)
- ⚠Ladder Logic: Forgetting to include stop conditions in seal-in circuits
- ⚠Ladder Logic: Not using one-shots for counter inputs, causing multiple counts per event
- ⚠Mitsubishi common error: Error 2110: Illegal device specified - accessing device outside configured range
- ⚠Safety Systems: Achieving required safety level with practical architecture
- ⚠Safety Systems: Managing nuisance trips while maintaining safety
- ⚠Neglecting to validate Emergency stop buttons (Category 0 or 1 stop) leads to control errors
- ⚠Insufficient comments make Ladder Logic programs unmaintainable over time